250 words, 140 characters, or 5 syllables? It doesn't matter how you slice or dice it; they all are limiting in their own respect.
First, I selected a quote from Anzaldua and set off to write a 250 word pierce of microfiction. I must say that being a very descriptive, some would say wordy, writer, I struggle with maximum word counts. I began with a set direction aiming for a simplistic and short way to say what I needed to say, yet my fingers told a much better complex and symbolic story. Within this assignment I grew as a writer by inserting color, adjusting tone, shifting tense, removing prepositions, utilizing thesaurus, and limiting words.
Next, I took this piece of microfiction entitled "Greyt Expectations" and used it to inspire a haiku. I must say that while I prefer the narrative form, the 3 stanza haiku did hold some weight as the words I selected were the windows of meaning taken from the microfiction. Some things I did learn, however, are that I should vary my word length and make my prepositions beefier, yet my verbs tend to be strong!
Then, in the same fashion that I wrote the first piece of microfiction based upon the Anzaldua readings, I explored my tweets and selected 2 of them that wouldn't normally coincide and enmeshed them into the same piece of microfiction. Since I started with my own style and voice, it was much easier to incorporate these outside quotes into my writing and make them flow. Within this piece alone, I took a risk writing the inner and outer thoughts of one character alone, all presenting a rather complex plot that I believe reader's can add their own experience.
Finally, I took my microfiction that was inspired by my tweets and tried to create a found poem based upon the words I wished to emphasize. For this assignment, I tried the haiku once again and found that since the tweets were not cohesive thoughts, the poem, already limited by syllables, became limited in meaning. I feel this was stretching the heart of the writing beyond its intended purpose.
Essentially, shifting genres forced me to think critically about each and every word I placed into my writing. Furthermore, I found myself saying if I only used this word, or if I only posted this thought. The biggest lesson I learned is that revisiting the same text at times may seem monotonous, yet it allows me to edit thngs that I wish to explore in hindsight of the first attempt!
First, I selected a quote from Anzaldua and set off to write a 250 word pierce of microfiction. I must say that being a very descriptive, some would say wordy, writer, I struggle with maximum word counts. I began with a set direction aiming for a simplistic and short way to say what I needed to say, yet my fingers told a much better complex and symbolic story. Within this assignment I grew as a writer by inserting color, adjusting tone, shifting tense, removing prepositions, utilizing thesaurus, and limiting words.
Next, I took this piece of microfiction entitled "Greyt Expectations" and used it to inspire a haiku. I must say that while I prefer the narrative form, the 3 stanza haiku did hold some weight as the words I selected were the windows of meaning taken from the microfiction. Some things I did learn, however, are that I should vary my word length and make my prepositions beefier, yet my verbs tend to be strong!
Then, in the same fashion that I wrote the first piece of microfiction based upon the Anzaldua readings, I explored my tweets and selected 2 of them that wouldn't normally coincide and enmeshed them into the same piece of microfiction. Since I started with my own style and voice, it was much easier to incorporate these outside quotes into my writing and make them flow. Within this piece alone, I took a risk writing the inner and outer thoughts of one character alone, all presenting a rather complex plot that I believe reader's can add their own experience.
Finally, I took my microfiction that was inspired by my tweets and tried to create a found poem based upon the words I wished to emphasize. For this assignment, I tried the haiku once again and found that since the tweets were not cohesive thoughts, the poem, already limited by syllables, became limited in meaning. I feel this was stretching the heart of the writing beyond its intended purpose.
Essentially, shifting genres forced me to think critically about each and every word I placed into my writing. Furthermore, I found myself saying if I only used this word, or if I only posted this thought. The biggest lesson I learned is that revisiting the same text at times may seem monotonous, yet it allows me to edit thngs that I wish to explore in hindsight of the first attempt!